join now
newsletters
topics
topics
advertise with us ABA Journal Blawg 100 Award 2009 ABA Journal Blawg 100 Award 2008
Subscribe (RSS Feed)TechnoLawyer Feed

How Much Don't You Know; Lawyer Mom Earning Big Bucks; Try This at Home; Calculators and Word Processors; WinFax Pro

By Sara Skiff | Friday, February 8, 2008

Coming February 15, 2008 to Fat Friday: Jerry Nicholson adds his two cents to the heated debate about software design and training, Jean Mahserjian responds to the thread on biglaw associate salaries with her own personal success story, Paul Nosek explains an old NASA trick for recovering data from a troubled hard drive, David Young waxes philosophical about Word and WordPerfect, and Thomas Daly reviews Winfax Pro for desktop faxing (and we explain the difference between desktop fax software and fax server software). Don't miss this issue.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published on Fridays, Fat Friday is a weekly newsletter that features a grab bag full of genuinely useful product reviews and tips on a wide variety of topics. Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Backup/Media/Storage | Business Productivity/Word Processing | CLE/News/References | Coming Attractions | Email/Messaging/Telephony | Fat Friday | Law Office Management | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

LegalTech New York 2008 Preview

By Neil J. Squillante | Tuesday, February 5, 2008

As usual, this week's LegalTech New York trade show and conference will bring a veritable blizzard of product announcements that we'll cover in detail in due course in TechnoLawyer NewsWire. We have 41 meetings lined up over the next three days (gulp).

For now, we've put together a linked list of all the noteworthy press releases and articles that have come our way. Unfortunately, some press releases are embargoed until tomorrow or later this week so we cannot share them with you now.

Storage Prepares for Court: New Products Prove that Legal and Technological Worlds Are Merging

ONSITE3 Showcases New eView Release at LegalTech 2008

WinScribe Announces Application for BlackBerry Smartphones at LegalTech New York Conference

Fios Announces Compliance with EDRM’s XML Standard

iCONECT Compliant with the EDRM XML Schema

Peak Off-Site Announces New Performance Metrics Tool to Boost Document Review Productivity and Reduce Costs

Lucid8 to Demonstrate New Digiscope 2.0 E-Discovery & Recovery for Microsoft Exchange at LegalTech

Inference Data Adds New Foreign Language & Rapid Review Features to E-Discovery Analytics Platform

New Release of Clearwell E-Discovery Platform Raises the Bar for Enterprise-Class E-Discovery Management

OpSource Delivers Web Application to Support Litigation Involving Electronic Evidence

Managed Document Review Now Available from SPi

Syngence Corporation Launches Near-Duplicate Solution, SynthetixND

The Sackett Group and American LegalNet Inc. Announce the Release of MacPac Connect

Synaptec Announces Release of LawBase 12

About TechnoEditorials
A TechnoEditorial is the vehicle through which we opine and provide tips of interest to managing partners, law firm administrators, and others in the legal profession. TechnoEditorials appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.

Topics: Backup/Media/Storage | Laptops/Smartphones/Tablets | Litigation/Discovery/Trials | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | TL Editorial

Windows on Mac; Archival Data Storage; iPhone Review; Dell and Small Firms; Graffiti Anywhere

By Sara Skiff | Friday, February 1, 2008

Coming February 8, 2008 to Fat Friday: Stephen Lambeth discusses four reasons why a lawyer would want to run Windows on a Mac, Mary Hallman provides several helpful tips for long-term storage of images and other files on CD and DVD, Harry Steinmetz reviews his experience using an iPhone, Neal Rogers responds to an ongoing thread about Dell's customer service (or lack thereof), and Doug Jacobs reviews Graffiti Anywhere for the Treo 650. Don't miss this issue.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published on Fridays, Fat Friday is a weekly newsletter that features a grab bag full of genuinely useful product reviews and tips on a wide variety of topics. Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Backup/Media/Storage | Coming Attractions | Email/Messaging/Telephony | Fat Friday | Laptops/Smartphones/Tablets | Networking/Operating Systems | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | Utilities

Biglaw's Key Advantage; Reviews of Latitude D630, Word 2007, PCmover, Mozy, Voyager 510, Quikscribe; Word Tip

By Sara Skiff | Friday, January 25, 2008

Coming February 1, 2008 to Fat Friday: Rodrick Enns explores an additional reason general counsel tend to hire large firms, Marty Barrack reviews his new Dell Latitude D630 laptop as well as Office 2007, PCmover, and Mozy, Barron Henley reviews the Plantronics Voyager 510 Bluetooth headset and compares it to the other seven he has tried, Pam Rolph explains how to open a WordPerfect document in Microsoft Word, and Russell Swartz reviews Quikscribe for digital dictation. Don't miss this issue.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published on Fridays, Fat Friday is a weekly newsletter that features a grab bag full of genuinely useful product reviews and tips on a wide variety of topics. Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Backup/Media/Storage | Business Productivity/Word Processing | Coming Attractions | Computer Accessories | Dictation/OCR/Speech Recognition | Fat Friday | Laptops/Smartphones/Tablets | Law Office Management | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | Utilities

Kodner on the State of Legal Technology

By TechnoLawyer Blog | Monday, January 21, 2008

[Publisher's Note: Today, a special treat — a guest TechnoEditorial by industry legend Ross Kodner. In the TechnoEditorial below, Ross responds to some questions about the state of legal technology recently sent to him by a reporter unaffiliated with TechnoLawyer. — Neil J. Squillante]

Technoguide0128081

WHAT SOFTWARE, GADGET, OR DEVICE DO YOU THINK ATTORNEYS MOST NEED TO INCORPORATE INTO THEIR WORK HABITS?

Lawyers don't need more gadgets and devices. Lawyers need to re-focus on how to better use the basic tools they already have for document generation, case information management, document/email/paper management, and their billing and financial systems.

Most firms I encounter barely use the systems they've already spent money on — including things as mundane as Microsoft Word. Smart law firms realize that effective use of technology is not about buying new things to solve problems in most cases, but rather focusing on better use of the core systems they already likely own. And realizing that ultimately, it's all about smart, simple, and practical procedures, and workflow. And further realizing that technology tools are just enablers to make sure processes from initial contact with a prospective client, through conflict checking and matter intake, through case handling, all the way to file archiving closure are done in the most effective way.

BUT IF THERE WAS ONE SOFTWARE APPLICATION LAWYERS REALLY NEED ...

I'd have to actually make it three (sorry — I can't decide):

First: Microsoft Word 2007 — the latest release of this product is LEAPS AND BOUNDS superior in every way to its miserably obtuse, perpetually mystifying, and downright exasperating predecessor Word 2003. Where Word 2003 has been a virtual instrument of torture for its users (victims?), Word 2007 is so dramatically improved, it seems almost un-Microsoft-like in its totally revamped and eminently logical layout. It's the first time I've ever publicly praised Microsoft Word.... I even have a new CLE program on precisely this subject that has been presented already around the country. It can be downloaded as a PDF.

As I've been pointing out in my CLE programs for several years, the next one is a little utility for Outlook users called Anagram. This little $30 Outlook-connected software utility allows you to highlight a name/address block in any program — in a document, in an email, on a Web site — and with a single keystroke, it splits it into individual fields of information and inserts them as an Outlook contact. This is a HUGE timesaver and the difference between saving contacts and not having the time to bother with the tedious manual approach. Thanks to techno-pal Browning Marean from DLA Piper for this tip — it's saved me, as well as hundreds of my clients, a significant amount of time.

Next up would be Metadata Assistant by PayneGroup. It's the first and, in my opinion, still the pre-eminent metadata removal and review tool for Word, Excel and PowerPoint files. In spite of years of educational efforts, a shocking number of lawyers are seemingly unaware of what metadata even is, no less its very real danger and threat to expose confidential information in electronically transmitted documents. And then add in the practical issues related to viewing hidden metadata in electronic documents obtained via discovery in litigation and this becomes perhaps the single most important piece of software that needs to be installed, and in informed use on every single law practice computer worldwide.

WHERE IS THE STATE OF WISCONSIN IN THE MOVEMENT TOWARD ELECTRONIC FILING AND WHAT SORTS OF SOFTWARE WILL THAT REQUIRE?

While this question addresses this issue in Wisconsin, many states are in much the same position in regard to e-filing. I'd say Wisconsin is slightly behind in state-based electronic filing of court documents compared to what I've seen in other states. Of course the Federal Court system has had electronic filing for years through its Pacer system. What Wisconsin lawyers need to prepare for the eventual and inevitable electronic filing in state courts and agencies is the ability to create PDF files from every workstation in their office.

The safest (but most costly) way to do this is using actual Adobe Acrobat (currently version 8 Professional is chock full of useful legal features like Bates stamping, secure redaction, etc. and is the version most should have) and especially to master it's critical functions related to securing PDFs to prevent alteration be recipients and removal of PDF metadata using the Examine Document feature in the latest release. Acrobat also supports secure digital signature technology which may very well be required for verification of online-filed court documents in Wisconsin (and likely other states) in the future.

MANY ATTORNEYS ARE CONCERNED WITH THE SECURITY OF ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION AND ARE THEREFORE HESITANT TO USE IT? ARE THOSE CONCERNS WELL-FOUNDED?

Absolutely. Sending an email containing confidential client or firm information over the Internet makes it disturbingly easy to intercept and exploit. I don't think there's anyone out there today who doesn't get the concept that ordinary email is completely insecure. But the vast majority of lawyers routinely, and in the ordinary course of business, send confidential and sometimes highly sensitive information via email every day.

This poses a fundamental technical ethical issue — if a lawyer knowingly transmits confidential information which they are ethically duty bound to protect over a known insecure medium, could it not be argued that each incident could constitute an ethical violation? It's an interesting subject for debate.

Until we have an explicit ethics opinion or rule that clarifies what obligations a lawyer has to protect confidential client electronic communications, I recommend erring on the side of caution. I tell my clients they should include a "Communications" section in their engagement agreements. It should state something to the effect of:

"We will use Internet email to communicate with you and on your behalf during the course of our representation of you. It is widely known that ordinary Internet email is entirely insecure. If you would like us to engage in something more secure than ordinary Internet email, please indicate so, otherwise we will presume that ordinary Internet email is acceptable."

I believe this satisfies the lawyer's obligation — the client is made aware of the risk and is given an opportunity to opt into some kind of secure/encrypted email approach.

DO YOU FIND RESISTANCE AMONG ATTORNEYS TO ADOPT NEW TECHNOLOGIES? IF SO, WHAT DO THINK IS THE MAIN CAUSE OF THAT RESISTANCE?

Sure. Perpetually. It's not just lawyers — it's most people. Human nature makes us pain avoiders — we tend to gravitate towards the easiest way to do the things we have to do. Change flies in the face of pain avoidance. Most lawyers I've met tend to bristle at the idea of changing their technology and interrupting the daily status quo. Even if logically, they know their practice is inefficient in many areas, they at least have gotten really good at efficiently being inefficient! It's the age-old progress-limiting trap of the devil you know often seems preferable to the one you don't.

The irony here is that the way to break out of that vicious circle and get off the endless treadmill is to step back and streamline practice approaches and procedures to improve client representation and minimize the stress of the reactive situations where fires have to be put out. Of course, alternatively, there's always Prozac.

The minority of my clients continent-wide, however, who see that change can be intensely positive. They see that there are always way to improve a practice approach, and streamline operations and maximize profitability by reducing non-billable administrative time as much as possible through smart application of procedures and technology, and that client service/retention can often be dramatically improved. These firms are the "super-competitors" because they'll eat change-resistant law firms for lunch before the victims even know it has happened.

WHAT IS YOUR OPINION OF VOICE RECOGNITION SOFTWARE IN GENERAL? IN TERMS OF APPLICATION IN THE LEGAL FIELD?

Voice recognition has been around since the mid-1990's in a mainstream sense. But finally, within the last 12 months, after more than 15 years of hype and frustration — voice recognition now works the way most users would expect it to.

The latest version of the leading Dragon NaturallySpeaking voice recognition software is just plain stunning.... It works the way people expect with virtually none of the drawbacks of prior generations such as cumbersome initial "training" requirements. Run it on a contemporary PC with a capable USB-connected headset or an approved handheld digital recorder and people will be blown away by how effective it is. Even if they had bad experiences with prior releases of these products.

Everyone can talk faster than they can type, and with body text being entered into word processing documents, lengthier emails, even time entries and case notes dictated into your case manager, voice recognition and its companion related concept of digital dictation now meet or exceed expectations. Now if only they can overcome the early bad experiences people had that turned them off to earlier iterations of this technology.

Colleague Jim Calloway blogged about the current edition of Dragon NaturallySpeaking (version 9). It's a must-read for TechnoLawyer member Chris Middleton (see his Question below) and everyone else for that matter.

IS THERE ANYTHING THAT YOU'VE FELT I SHOULD HAVE ASKED YOU THAT I HAVEN'T?

I could go on ad infinitum on topics like why I think law practices would be certifiably nuts not to have mission-critical tools such as case management and document managements systems, the critical distinctions between IT (Information Technology) and LT (Legal Technology), or how effective my Paper LESS Office process has been over the years, or how lawyers using WiFi connections in public wireless hotspots is absolutely insecure and should never be done when transmitting client-related information versus using secure wireless broadband cards offered by cell providers, or how badly law firms tend to apply process and systems training for their lawyers and staff using "memorization" as the modality versus task oriented knowledge-building ... but we can leave those for another day.

A version of the above article originally appeared in Ross Ipsa Loquitur, a legal technology blog written by industry legend Ross Kodner. Ross serves as the president of MicroLaw, which has helped law firms with technology since 1985, and is the only five-time individual Technolawyer @ Award winner, including the lifetime achievement award for Legal Technology Consultant of the Year in 1999. He also contributed to BlawgWorld 2007-08 with TechnoLawyer Problem/Solution Guide.

About TechnoEditorials
A TechnoEditorial is the vehicle through which we opine and provide tips of interest to managing partners, law firm administrators, and others in the legal profession. TechnoEditorials appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.

Topics: Business Productivity/Word Processing | CLE/News/References | Coming Attractions | Dictation/OCR/Speech Recognition | Document Management | Practice Management/Calendars | Privacy/Security | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | TL Editorial | Utilities

Treo 680 Review; Host Your Own Trade Show; Anatomy of a Backup; Perils of Software Downgrades; Avvo Review

By Sara Skiff | Friday, January 18, 2008

Coming January 25, 2008 to Fat Friday: Michael Caldwell compares his old Treo 650 to his new Treo 680, Douglas Thomas explains how to host your own legal technology trade show in your hometown, WIlliam Lloyd shares the details of his office's backup system and a new online system he's testing, Jay Brice discusses his experience trying to downgrade Amicus Attorney, and Daniel Fennick reviews the attorney ratings site Avvo. Don't miss this issue.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published on Fridays, Fat Friday is a weekly newsletter that features a grab bag full of genuinely useful product reviews and tips on a wide variety of topics. Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Accounting/Billing/Time Capture | Backup/Media/Storage | Coming Attractions | Email/Messaging/Telephony | Fat Friday | Laptops/Smartphones/Tablets | Online/Cloud | Practice Management/Calendars | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

The Law 2.0 Manifesto: Lawyers of the World, Unite

By Sara Skiff | Friday, January 18, 2008

Coming January 22, 2008 to TechnoFeature: First came the store, then the mail order catalog, and then online shopping. Lawyer and legal technology futurist Mazyar Hedayat sees a similar path for law firms, especially small firms. Specifically, he forecasts a shift from monolithic software applications that require technical expertise to integrate with one another to lightweight "Web 2.0" applications that easily integrate. In other words, welcome to "Law 2.0." Please pardon the dust and watch your step as Mazyar shows you around and points out some of the most promising Law 2.0 applications.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published on Tuesdays, TechnoFeature is a weekly newsletter that contains in-depth articles written by leading legal technology and practice management experts. Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Coming Attractions | Online/Cloud | TechnoFeature | Technology Industry/Legal Profession

PaperPort 11 Review; TrialDirector Review; Paperless Office Tips; Integrated Law Office; Word Versus WordPerfect

By Sara Skiff | Friday, January 11, 2008

Coming January 17, 2008 to Answers to Questions: Miriam Jacobson reviews PaperPort 11 in the context of her almost paperless workflow, Frank St. Claire introduces open source alternatives to the Word versus WordPerfect debate (borrowing ideas from Aldous Huxley's Brave New World), Yvonne Renfrew explains how to create a hard copy or electronic index of files for your paperless office, Edward Schoenecker reviews TrialDirector 5.1 and Visionary Discovery Management, and Richard Skilton shares tips for achieving truly integrated legal software. Don't miss this issue.

How to Receive this Newsletter
Published Thursdays, Answers to Questions is a weekly newsletter in which TechnoLawyer members answer legal technology and practice management questions submitted by their peers (including you if you join TechnoLawyer). Like all of our newsletters, it's free. Please subscribe now.

Topics: Business Productivity/Word Processing | Coming Attractions | Document Management | Litigation/Discovery/Trials | Presentations/Projectors | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | TL Answers

Robin Hood and the Dragon (NaturallySpeaking)

By Neil J. Squillante | Tuesday, January 8, 2008

Nearly two years ago I lamented the dearth of "young guns" in legal technology. Dennis Kennedy emailed me to say that Tom Mighell of Inter Alia was such a person.

Apparently, Dennis and I have different notions of a young gun. Tom is my age. I define a young gun as someone under the age of 30.

Legends like Ross Kodner and Dennis Kennedy were in their twenties when they started writing about legal technology. Why isn't there a Ross 2.0 or Dennis 2.0 on the scene?

Well, maybe there is.

Meet Robin Hood (his real name), a third year law student at Mississippi College of Law. Concerned about the error-prone nature of using previous documents to create new documents at the law firm where he clerks, he created a set of Microsoft Word macros for drafting routine documents such as letters and pleadings. He also bought a copy of Dragon NaturallySpeaking so that he could verbally produce these documents.

Robin demoed his work on YouTube as you would expect a young gun to do. Watch his instructive video, Speech Recognition for Lawyers (click here if you can't see the video below).

About TechnoEditorials
A TechnoEditorial is the vehicle through which we opine and provide tips of interest to managing partners, law firm administrators, and others in the legal profession. TechnoEditorials appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.

Topics: Business Productivity/Word Processing | Dictation/OCR/Speech Recognition | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | TL Editorial | Videos

TechnoLawyer's 2008 Predictions

By Neil J. Squillante | Monday, January 7, 2008

Technoguide0107081450

In past years, we have published the predictions of others. But this year we bring you our own predictions.

1. Viva Law Evolution!

Don't expect any revolutionary changes from 2007. Most of the lawyers who presided over law firms five years ago let alone one year ago remain in charge today. It takes decades for management to change across a profession. The old guard embraces new technology, but out of necessity, not because they grew up with a mouse in their hand.

Talk to me in 20 years when today's young lawyers (under age 35) are running the show. At that point, the differences from today will be dramatic. But then as now, the differences between 2027 and 2028 will be evolutionary, not revolutionary.

2. Apotheosis of the General Counsel

Years ago, few legal vendors had much interest in corporate counsel. Even today, it would seem to make more sense to pursue the 800,000 or so lawyers in private practice than the 100,000 or so in corporations. And plenty of vendors still do that. (See American Bar Association, Market Research Department.)

But with the rise of electronic discovery, corporate counsel find themselves in need of technology solutions that didn't exist five years ago. Chief among these — applications for archiving email and other documents in anticipation of lawsuits, and applications for preserving and culling relevant documents from these archives after being sued but before engaging outside counsel.

On the corporate end, vendors that provide document automation solutions have discovered just as much of a need exists in legal departments as in law firms. Also, the needs are not exactly the same.

This burgeoning market coupled with the relatively small number of lawyers in corporations means that they now wield considerable power. In this respect, their relationship with legal vendors has become increasingly like that of doctors with pharmaceutical companies. Expect the power of general counsel and their minions to grow in 2008.

3. Web Applications Inch Towards Greater Acceptance

Web applications will continue to make inroads in 2008, but they will not displace desktop software anytime soon.

A Web application can do almost anything a desktop application can do. And now that lawyers have become accustomed to online banking and online backups, concerns about confidentiality have largely vanished.

But several issues remain unclear.

First, while Web applications don't require an initial capital expenditure, they can end up costing more, particularly if a firm skips upgrades and doesn't work with consultants. Therefore, cost is ultimately a losing argument. Instead, Web application providers should focus on their inherent advantages — new features without installation hassles and ease of use.

Second, while every airplane will someday have WiFi, that day won't arrive in 2008. Will Google Gears or a similar technology enable lawyers to use legal Web applications without an Internet connection?

Third, a year ago desktop software had a key advantage over Web applications — their mobile counterparts worked better on smartphones. But Apple's iPhone proved that you could have a real Web browser on a smartphone.

Fourth, when will Microsoft release a Web version of Office? That will be a very good day for Web applications. It probably won't happen in 2008.

Fifth, who ultimately wins — startups or today's market leaders? Both probably. The legal technology market remains remarkably fragmented. While some market leaders will acquire Web applications, others will probably have no choice but to build their own since it's probably impossible to make a Web application look and feel like your desktop application unless you build it from the ground up that way. As with every inflection point, one or two of today's startups will become market leaders themselves.

4. PDF Cedes Some Power But Remains an Essential Format

The first revolution in discovery occurred when software enabled lawyers to convert paper into digital files. The TIFF format eventually gave way to PDF because of the latter's flexibility and ubiquity.

The second revolution is now underway and will gather steam in 2008 — software and Web applications that manage email and other electronic documents. Many of these solutions enable law firms to review documents in their native file format without having to buy the original software programs.

When law firms employ such solutions, PDF doesn't play a role during the review process — except of course for scanned paper documents. Instead, it only serves as an export option for production, depositions, and trials.

While PDF may no longer have the spotlight all to itself in discovery, it remains the top dog for law firm records management. The certification of PDF/A as the preferred format for long-term storage pretty much ended whatever prospects competing formats may have had in this area.

5. Print Publications Pass Their Prime

Let me start by revealing two embarrassing mistakes, one from long ago and one recent.

When I put together our first media kit (a term of art to describe a document that lists advertising rates) in 1998, the cover depicted our mascot Netsquire (half computer, half lawyer), placing Web banners in garbage cans. The message was that our marketing opportunities were more effective than Web banners.

All well and good except in 1998 virtually all advertising dollars were spent on print ads, not Web banners. Wrong target. Oops.

Last summer as we geared up to release our eBook we hired a public relations firm to generate coverage among the major legal print publications. We thought the simultaneous launch of an eBook on 77 Web sites would be newsworthy.

We soon learned what should have been obvious — these publications don't cover events like this or even review eBooks for that matter. That's what online publications do. You know, like TechnoLawyer. And blogs. Duh. To this day, no print publications have covered our eBook.

In 2008, online legal publications will continue to apply pressure to mainstream legal print publications.

For example, note the rapid rise of Above the Law in which David Lat singlehandedly covers the dark underbelly of large law firm life as no print publication would dare. David is the Matt Drudge of the legal world.

Above the Law costs a fraction of what it costs to produce a print publication, which means it can thrive on a fraction of the revenue that print publications need.

This example underscores why print publications cannot simply shift their business model online — as uninformed armchair quarterbacks often suggest. The dollars online don't measure up. And whatever dollars do exist online, 30-40% go to Google.

The economics of the online world — lower advertising rates, measurable return on investment demanded by advertisers, and few if any subscription opportunities — benefit publications built from the ground up with these facts in mind.

Perhaps most vulnerable are print legal technology publications. Last year, James Publishing pulled the plug on Law Office Computing, which relied on subscription revenue.

The free publications are better situated. However, even if they overcome the cost structure problems outlined above, they face one insurmountable problem — you cannot click on a Web address printed on paper. Don't laugh. It's not a joke. It's a serious problem for a technology publication.

6. Others' Predictions

Finally, a few predictions relayed to me by others:

• A solo independent legal technology consultant confided in me that he and others like him are the last of a dying breed.

Brian Ritchey of More Partner Income predicts good times for bankruptcy and voting rights lawyers, more law firm mergers and practice group acquisitions, increasing use of business intelligence tools, the quasi-death of the billable hour, and minimal impact on lawyers by a recession.

John Wallbillich of The Wired GC predicts corporations will tighten legal spending and more law firm mergers.

Kevin O'Keefe of Real Lawyers Have Blogs predicts that savvy law firms will incorporate social networking into their marketing plans. He also predicts that law firm marketing managers who dismiss this form of marketing and don't seek expert help risk losing their job.

About TechnoEditorials
A TechnoEditorial is the vehicle through which we opine and provide tips of interest to managing partners, law firm administrators, and others in the legal profession. TechnoEditorials appear first in TechnoGuide, and later here in TechnoLawyer Blog. TechnoGuide, which is free, also contains exclusive content. You can subscribe here.

Topics: Business Productivity/Word Processing | Litigation/Discovery/Trials | Online/Cloud | Technology Industry/Legal Profession | TL Editorial
 
home my technolawyer search archives place classified blog login